why government should invest in art

helenascholin15858 May 13, 2022 government , invest , should , why Comment

Artists survived quite well during the Renaissance without government subsidy and they could survive just as well today. We need to remember our own poems songs language crafts etc.

Marco Pariani At Cheim Read New York Usa On 19 Feb 30 Apr 2021 Ocula Viewing Room Room Spray Paint On Canvas

In addition the government must also invest money in operas to give a chance for the people to show their talents.

. In my opinion Governments should support the arts through funding. It has always been an important cultural endeavor. Secondly art provides a way for humans to express themselves.

No says Pete Spence the newest addition to the Adam Smith Institute team at The Economists debate site. You as the investor purchase shares in a fund and art experts invest in works of art that reflect positive trends in the market so that you dont have to risk purchasing work that wont provide a return. In their opinion public money should be spent on improving social services and infrastructure.

To further explain With government support We can make good art And it can even promote our countrys art And this can attract tourists And our country can be famous for the arts. First of all It can build the country brand and promote tourism. It allows us to look at the world in a new way.

I believe that the federal and state governments have a stake in funding the arts just as they have a stake in funding education and exploration social justice and protecting citizens. Government funding is crucial for the existence of arts. There are several reasons why governments should spend money on art.

What defines a country is its art so the government should fund money in building theaters in order to give a chance for preforming folklore dancing and arts. Having strong art programs in a community will stimulate business activity and produce tax revenue. Here are some reasons why.

The government should not subsidize the arts because the arts are a private enterprise. First of all art is a very important part a nations culture. According to some people the government should not invest in arts or music as they offer little return on investment.

In conclusion the government should invest some money to improve arts creation because it has a big opportunity to make a country more successful. A conservative government will subsidize conservative artists while a liberal. The only way to kindle their passion is to provide them financial assistance.

Public funding of the arts is an investment with high yields. Private patronage is the proper subsidy for the arts. Though spending money on public services is necessary.

Another essential thing is people have to make a good teamwork with the government to produce huge advantages related to arts creations. The Government should encourage upcoming generation to attract various art forms by giving them physical mental as well as financial support. In this context the major justification for government arts funding became its contribution both to that trade and to trade in general a case based on the mounting evidence of the economic value.

Art funds allow for a combination of art financial expertise with a large capital base and exceptional advisors. By - Keith. Hence too much money distributed to art would break the balance of society and You May Also Find These Documents Helpful.

Strong art programs will also attract tourists in a community thus bringing in revenue. Each 1 in federal arts funds leverages another 9 from other public and. The government spends a substantial part of its budget these days not just on public works but also on the arts.

This deters many of them from pursuing art as a profession. While I do admit that it is important to spend money on public services arts cannot and should not be ignored. This starts from the top with federal funds.

Why Government Should Invest in the Arts The arts are an important community builder and prosperity generator warranting investment from the public sector. Pete makes a strong argument against taxpayer subsidies for the arts arguing that they should be opposed not because of the cost but because of the harmful impact of government money on the arts themselves. The arts of the county is of out most importance to its culture.

Preserving art forms are the major responsibility of a ruling authority because it shows the past history of the society as well as nation. Promotion of art forms in the future generation is the main. Should the government fund the arts.

Art itself does not generate much revenue and hence artists especially the lesser-known ones have to struggle to make a living. Studies have shown that the arts create a successful and sustainable strategy for revitalizing rural areas inner cities and populations struggling with poverty. Art is not a frill.

Why The Government Doesn T Need To Regulate The Sharing Economy Street Art Sharing Economy Investing In Shares